LETTERS + POSTS
RE: DUNNING DEAN – Did the Doctor Get GORED
From: "allen houston" <adhoustonscribe@yahoo.com>:
<hammerschlag@bigfoot.com>Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:11 AM
Just read your Dean
Gored piece from a link on buzzflash.com. I'm a reporter that works on a small
paper in Texas and unfortunately I have grown increasingly disillusioned with
the way that the mainstream media's political coverage (well most of its
coverage).
I basically become interested in Dean back when he was Gov.
I used to live in New York and I covered a story when he was trying to pass the
healthcare package for kids. What struck me was a really blunt quote that he
said, in essence "Screw the drug companies, if they want to fight, I'll
fight, even if I have to drive the kids to Canada personally for their
medication". I paraphrase because I lost that article somewhere in the
move down south. Anyway, that stuck with me and when the war started Dean was
the only one at that time speaking out against in clear tones. Of course, then
came the rise and fall of Dr. Dean. Let me say that he's not a perfect person
by any stretch of the imagination but he was opposed to an immoral war, he
didn't vote for the patriot act, no child left behind, etc. Like many of the
dems. That said, the media has been unusually hateful and malice-filled in its
coverage of Dean. As you pointed out, it has gone through various transitions
as the media has tried
to pin Dean down to
an easy label.
When Howard Fineman asked Dean if Christ was his personal
savior and Koppell asked if Dean could win, I nearly lost. Of course the
negative coverage worked and Dean appears to be on his way out (I still hold a
little hope). Kerry, I don't know, the guy just doesn't excite me. I have the
sneaking suspicion that with him as president things won't improve that much
(of course bush out is a good start). Okay, check out my site www.freepressed.com . I have story on
the top left about how the media has coronated and dethroned in front runners.
My little way to blow off steam.-al
RE: DEAN and the
WORLD:
From: "florence murphy" <murrock@webtv.net >Subject: Dean and the World Date: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:59 AM
Thoroughly enjoyed your article about Dean, for me, he is the only candidate who appears to have the guts to speak up and who hasn't been tainted by the DC lobbyists. Kerry, Lieberman, Gephardt have been in DC for lots of years and even with some Dem. power have done little for the general common good. I personally don't trust them to put in universal health care. Clintons made a big mistake; had they gone for the whole nut we might have gotten something for the people. Now, we have the GOP version of nothing. Thanks again. Florence Murphy walk in beauty ciao
----------------------------------------------
Re: Michael Hammerschlag: 'Dean and the
world' (Score: 1)
by ARTH
(arth32@hotmail.com) on Friday, January
09 @ 11:11:00 EST
(User
Info)
The real politics of the United States
is the politics of the swing voters who are between 10 and 20 per cent of the
electorate in a typical election. Their politics is a politics of semiotics,
i.e. a politics of symbols and moods which translate into a vote for one
candidate or another. One candidate has a positive image and a second one has a
negative image. These symbols are created by the establishment newsmedia
usually to the detriment of the candidate of the Democratic party.
--This is the problem, it really doesn't matter what Dean
is actually like in person or what his real stands on issues are. What matters
is how much a candidate can free himself of the stereotypes that the society or
at least its official sources pin upon him. They will keep hammering that Dean
is "angry." Actually, W. seems far more angry, far less kind, more
cruel and sadistic, and hateful as President than the worse moments of Dean's
life.
--That is where Dean shows promise, he can take it, he does
not hedge his positions, he answers everything back immediately and without
self-doubt. That is the hope.
--Any of the Democratic candidates for president would do
better than W. and the Republicans on security and anti-terrorism issues but
the official media will never examine this issue objectively, only in terms of
semiotics and cardboard, irrelevant characatures.
-----------------------------------------------------
From: "Benjie Watts" bwatts53@yahoo.com Subject: My guess would be....Date: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:28 PM
My guess would be Bush 49 States
Dean, Kerry, or any other Dem....1
Benjie Watts PS..If you were honest you'd predict the same thing. MH- I am honest + you are nuts.
-----------------------------------------------------
|
Dean and the World from DAILYKOS.com by dabize
I haven't seen an article with which I agree this much in a while. It addresses the silliness of the CW that Dean is weak on foreign policy (NOBODY is weak on FP next to Bush), plus many other issues, such as the need to fight the Bushian madness directly.
|
__________________________________
RE: STOPPING the
NEXT BOSNIA:
From:
"Mary Murphy" dogstar1@telus.net Subject: Partitioning Iraq Date: Saturday,
December 13, 2003 5:09 PM
I
appreciated your article on possibly partitioning Iraq. As far as I know it's
the first time this practical solution has ever been offered. I've thought of this, too - but what do I
know, right? It makes sense in many
ways ... may eventually happen anyway as events play themselves out. Most Americans don't realize that Iraq was
pretty much an artificial construction anyway, and there is history (mostly
engineered by imperial powers) behind the three-way split. Saddam Hussein hardly invented the process
by which Sunnis dominated.
----However,
I don't see the US - or Britain for that matter who pretty much set up the
present configuration - going for it.
Also another thing which I've never seen discussed, but I'd like your
take on it, should you have time to respond to this: I've looked at a map of oil fields in Iraq and, while there is
definitely oil in the Sunni center of things, it looks to me like
there's
significantly more in both the North and the South. Might this not make partitioning even more problematic?
----Whether
the Turks could accommodate, let alone augment, a Kurdistan would be another
issue.
-----Anyway,
I fear the US has gotten itself into a quagmire and I'm not sure that the
American troops WILL be able to leave, at least given the historic way
Americans (and for that matter, all imperial powers) think. Whether the US will support a long-term and
costly occupation/guerilla war - particularly without invoking the
politically-potent spectre of
conscription
- is the question. Will blacks,
southern and rural whites, and Hispanics be willing to shoulder more than their
share of the burden (and the deaths) indefinitely? The continued erosion of the
manufacturing sector and, to some degree, the small-scale family farm will help
provide cannon (er, explosive device) fodder but, sooner or later, someone's
going to say, "what's wrong with this picture?"
----Anyway,
thanks for the thought-provoking article (which I believe I found linked-to
from Lunaville). I've been to your web
site and read more there, too.
Regards, Mary Murphy British Columbia, Canada
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From:
"Geoffrey J. Transom" GeoffreyTransom@netscape.net Three State Solution...Date: Saturday,
December 13, 2003 4:22 PM
I
just read your December 12th piece on The Capital Times site, and it was
terrific. I was particularly happy to see someone refer to America's OBLIGATION
in international law to repair the broken infrastructure that resulted from the
US-led invasion.
----However
when you proposed a "three state" solution, you progressively
"went utopian". The likelihood of the international community being
able to encourage Turkey and Iran to contribute LAND to a Kurdish homeland is
zero; even suggesting that as a possibility is bordering on naive (I don't use
the word "naive" as a perjorative).
----All
you have to do to contextualize the absolute unacceptability of even suggesting
a land-grab off Turkey and Iran for the Kurds, is to imagine if the UN called
for the US to give the Latino/Mexican "Reconquista movement" a little
patch of land of their own in the American southwest (say, New Mexico, Southern
California, and perhaps even all the way East to the illegally-acquired state
of Texas). It is no historical misrepresentation to assert that these people
were dispossessed by the United States in the 19th century and have been
oppressed systematically ever since. Sure, there are no death squads in New
Mexico (we are constantly reminded that Hussein supposedly had death squads,
but the US now has death squads in Iraq anyhow!).
----And
to think - all this mess in Iraq really started in London and Washington in the
1910's and 1920's, with the contemptible assumption by people like Churchill
that they could draw a line on a map and create (say) Kuwait.
----The
stupidity of those same men in capitulating to terrorists (those who forced the
Balfour Declaration in 1917 by assassinating people until the declaration was
issued) gave us the OTHER Middles East problem; a Zionist (and mostly
Khazar-Turkic) state in the middle of a pack of Islamic/Christian (and mostly
Arab-Semitic) countries. That, too, will end in tears - hopefully without the
atomic evaporation of a small piece of what is mistakenly called
"Israel" by people who do not understand what "Israel"
means.
Regards, Geoffrey J. Transom,
Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
-----------------------------------
From:
"Gerald Lower" tisland@blackhills.com Subject: Jefferson's Eyes Tuesday, November
18, 2003 1:07 PM
Thank
you for "Stopping the Next Bosnia" and for your honest coverage of
Bush World.
"If
the American people are to be responsible for the actions of their government,
they will necessarily have to begin by being responsible to
themselves."
One
of the glaring characteristics of the "dumbing down" of America is
our devoutness about living in the here and now, whether the
commentaries
come with a Repuglican or Dumbocrat slant.
The situation becomes much more serious and significant from historical
perspectives
(the
political death of Jefferson's democracy) and even more serious and significant
from evolutionary perspectives (the "end of time" for
vengeance-based
religion and crony capitalism, the beginning of human). Dr. Gerry Lower
-------------------------------------------
From:
"Judy Po" Judypo@GotNet.Net
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:11 AM
Thank
you for saying what nobody had been able to articulate.
By
the way, I think your 9 to 12 month estimate to be optimistic. I think we will
be out by July.
Brian
Miller Stockton California
HAMMERSCHLAG REPLIES:
You're right, we couldn't build one damn road in Afghanistan
after blasting the detestable Taliban and Bush has trashed every International
treaty that's essential for American security. We don't build things unless
it's part of sweetheart payoff to Repub firms at 20 to 50 times the going rate
of what Iraqis would charge.
----As to dividing Iraq, I don't assess it's likelihood or viability- it is an
idea, a new idea that might get people thinking. Editors thought it was sort of
radical (till, see below, NYT did it). As far as Turkey giving up a piece, who knows? It got a good laugh at a conference on Kurds when I asked the Turkish rep, but A. Turkey is desperate to get in EU and EU wants to make them prove they are civilized (as should everyone); B. Turkey has been fighting nasty rebel actions for ages against the Kurds, C. that little corner of mountains is useless to the Turks since they don't control it except by air, and D. they, like the Israelis, might finally realize that giving up some land is a good deal for peace. As far as Iran, they have no big beef with the Kurds, they gave them respite and shelter from Iraqi + Turkic persecution.
----As far as Turkey opposing a Kurdish state, my reaction to that is the same to the thuggish Chinese who threaten Taiwan for squeaking independence: screw 'em. We don't have to kowtow to bullies (except when they supply 90% of goods in WallMart). The Brits were, of course, arrogant, but lines were going to get drawn, they just drew them very badly (though Iraq, Syria, Jordan were almost one big pan-Arab state, which would have lasted 2 years before exploding). Regarding Israel's evaporation, this is thing I did about Israel's nukes. I now think Palestinians are so exhausted they would blow up Tel Aviv, even if it meant they would be fried too. Thank Aussies for treating Bush with the respect he deserves. http://members.surfbest.net/mikehammer/seatsott.gif
NEXT STAR OF BETHLEHEM?- (Seattle Times)- Meaning and implications of Israeli nuclear arsenal (200 bombs?); Vanunu's proof, kidnapping, + imprisonment
------You
are very sharp about the oil wells- I missed that, but it would be a huge bone
of contention. I think the election will force withdrawal of 3/4 or so of US
soldiers by Sept., depending on how big successfull attacks are waged against
us. One Beirut sized bomb and pressure for withdrawal would be huge.
I don't worry too much about the lower castes of US troops- think
they're paid pretty well, compared to almost anything else they could do at
that age and experience- frankly I'm frightened by the fact that almost
no soldier verbally opposed this idiotic invasion and went to Sweden or
Canada (or no media reported it). I think we are one nuke away from becoming an
instant police state, and these troops would as quickly repress Americans in
the street. Don't understand why we are out of soldiers with only 150-180,000
in Iraq and Afghanistan and poor Nat. Guard tapped so cruelly (one weekend a
month, unless your Prez wants to show up his daddy). They are really getting
shafted, on med care, respect, lost jobs, etc.). Lunaville is good on
casualties stats.
sent out couple of weeks ago
NYTimies could have run my wonderful piece sent 4 weeks ago, but instead wait and run almost same thing Nov 25 by Head of Council on Foreign Relations- Leslie Gelb http://hammernews.com/3statesolution.htm , whom I've met and spoken with a few years ago. Esp. since I actually wrote it in my head in beginning of Oct., so again am way ahead of curve. He has more of the mechanics of partition and isn't advocating it as a way to prevent bloodbath of our departure or grant a homeland to long-suffering Kurds, but as way of punishing Sunnis by depriving them of oil revenue, and avoid getting blown up. No oil reserves in center apparently, which I didn't have (but at 1300 words had no space anyway). CFR is concerned with the application of US power and never criticizes the government, but has some brilliant people, like Stephen Flynn, author + director of HART-RUDMAN Report on America's vulnerability to terrorism. RADIO REPORT: http://tomhammers.tripod.com/flynn20.ram (must access this from audio page?)
RE: BUSH’s BIG
BETRAYAL
|
Re: Michael Hammerschlag: 'Bush's fatal mistake'
(Score: 1) |
|
I sure as hell wish one of the Dems running for
president had the GUTS to tell it like it is like you do. Maybe you should
run or at least become the speech writer for one of them. Keep it up. |
- Dean does!!! by cedricbarnowl on Saturday,
July 26 @ 11:22:23 EDT
|
Re: Michael Hammerschlag: 'Bush's fatal mistake'
(Score: 1) |
|
|
Note: A reactionary liberal is every bit as dangerous as
a reactionary rightwinger. |
|
|
Re: Michael Hammerschlag: 'Bush's fatal mistake'
(Score: 1) |
||
|
The main point here - bush/cheney are likely out in
2004. If a known quantity and insider with connections like Kerry gets the
nomination, bush's political end in 2004 is virtually guaranteed. |
||
|
RE: FIRM of MIND; SOFT on FACTS
|
|
RE: WHOOPS, HOW THE MEDIA GOT IT WRONG
From: NANLYONS@aol.com
To:
hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002
03:32:02 EDT
Subject: Under this new
regime...
Are there going to be those "Election
System AccuVote 2000 optical ballot-scanning machines" that "lose their minds", in every County in the
nation? Who provides the cards and/or the programming for the cards and
machines -- and which side are they really on? Thank you for your wonderful article about the Florida
election mess. It was beautifully written. But my conclusion is, nevertheless, that with all
the tampering by the Republican extremists in the offices of the County
elections officials, I strongly suspect that our last proper election was
already history prior to the Nov. 2000 debacle. Politically, I am
radically moderate, but I'm now considered to be far left wing, only because
the center has shifted so far off course. And there are literally
millions of Americans without a voice in the previously-but-no-longer
"free press", who are pulling for journalists like yourself who will
publish what is outlawed by the commercial press, as best as I can tell.
But for those of us fortunate enough to have computers -- and who know where to
look -- we can still find articles by people who really do value free speech,
and the courage to speak out. Even if you're too busy to ever read my
e-mail, I just wanted to write it to say 'thank you', while I still have the
freedom to do so.
All the best, Nan Lyons …. Henderson, N.C.
Re: Trembling on the Brink
From: "Lakhbir
Gandhi" <lgandhi@peerless.com>
To:
<hammerschlag@bigfoot.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002
13:47:39 -0800
Subject: congress
A distinction sir, the Indian Congress is not a government institution like it is here in the US but the name of Indira Gandhi's political party which is not even in power as of today but has been for much of the 50 yrs since independence. And before you ask, no , I am not related to any of the other Gandhi's you hear about. I liked the content of your article and agree, Pakistan has been thumbing their nose at India for awhile so the Indians are trying to make the most of this ghastly opportunity handed to them.
One idea I have is that since neither are willing to compromise on Kashmir why don't they both declare the entire Kashmir a jointly administered territory. That can form the basis of a collaboration lasting and giving decades of peace. It can also be an opportunity to understand ultimately that the division of India & Pakistan was a political ploy by the British to defang India when they left and start toying with the idea of a united India, a new name for the union shouldn't be hard to think of. The Kashmiri people will then enjoy India's secular and monetary policies while feeling as being one with Pakistan, they shouldn't complain about this arrangement barring a few aspiring politicians trying to take advantage of the situation. ----Pakistan then gets the backing of India's industrial might & India can stop pouring money into defence & look after it's own poverty for a change, not to mention knocking the wind out China's meddling in the region.
Regards, Lakhbir Gandhi MH Your point was well-taken and the wording’s been
changed to avoid confusion.
Re: Mixed Signals
From: Sheppy3579@aol.com
To:
hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001
13:55:27 EDT
Subject: I read your article on liberal slant. it is so
nice to read a "thinking
article",
I am forwarding it to many on my mailing list. My personal opinion is that we
will NOT be able to get bin Ladin. My personal suggestion is to deal with him
as cancer research is dealing with tumor-- he is a tumor and shrink and kill
all the "cells-men" and his funds until he has nothing left to feed
on and will shrink and dry up. Simple yes, but maybe easier than bushie's plan
to crawl in the maze of holes he lives in. Thank you, Adrienne
Re: End of Bush’s Rohypnol Honeymoon
From: ARazeghi@aol.com
To:
hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001
01:13:34 EDT
Your
article was stunning. Thank you for speaking the truth. Sad that
this sort of honest writing can only be
found on the internet. While reading the Washington Post
(that alleged bastion of liberal thought) today, I was struck by the fact that the editorial page had three
right wing columnists and two centrists. Every headline was spun to make
Bush appear in command. I feel as though I've gone through the
looking glass and I'm terrified for the future of this country.
Thank you for speaking out.
Patricia Razeghi
From:
John Coyle <jcoyle@admin.ogi.edu>
To:
hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
Date:
Fri, 13 Apr 2001 13:24:17 -0800
Thank you, Mr. Hammerschlag. Thank you for having the
courage to communicate what the comatose, corporate-controlled mass media
simply refuses to do: report the truth.
These are historical times we live in. This
nation--nay, the world--deserves far better than the shameless pandering and
insulting propaganda that is put forth by a vast majority of the American
press.
As folks like myself engage ourselves in politics, it
is difficult to keep our "eyes on the prize" when we are forced-fed
such manipulative disinformation. ("Liberal media," ideed!)
You, however, are an inspiration. It is my personal
belief that our tightly-wound nation will soon experience a significant
political/social"awakening." Please keep writing. The world will need
to know the truth.` P.S. If you
have moment, please visit the following site: http://www.democraticunderground.com/
John R. Coyle
Portland, OR
From: "Susan W.
Schwartz" <ssbaraca@meganet.net>
To:
hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001
21:30:35 -0400
Dear Mr. Hammerschlag:
Thank you
for this cogent, wonderfully spirited commentary. Perhaps I felt such a sense of consonance with your views because
certain paragraphs read as if transcribed from my mind. It is likewise especially refreshing to read
your truth-reveling text, given the cynical Orwellian-speak of Bush-boy and his
Bush, Inc. cronies. Thank you for your
work. Wishing you and yours many
blessings. Susan
From:
S2810507@aol.com
To:
hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 16:33:42 EDT (Caution: toxic lunatic)
You are one sick, sorry, SOB suck ass. You should know about CORRUPTNESS, only a clinton ass kisser could recognize something like that to put into words. All the shit you spew should be shoved up your ass and twisted. clintons (yes both of them) are the biggest traitors to come on the American scene for a very long time. Maybe since harry hopkins. Yet people like you are so quick to jump on someone else. Where was your wise ass comments when the sick sonofabitch was sitting there in the White House? Where are you with your comments about the whore (or is she a lezzie?) sitting in the senate that SHE BOUGHT (she couldn't have done it any other way other than corruptly). You make me sick and I would love to tell you to KISS MY ASS.
Re: Relativity
DateFrom: CMHEBERT@aol.com:
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:50:47 EST
Subject: Your editorial
I read
your editorial/article at the bartcop.com site and just wanted to say
this: I have read dozens of articles
criticizing what happened with this
awful
election, but yours was absolutely the BEST!
You
covered every single issue that needs to be addressed and had some new
perspectives on issues that are being “done” to death, i.e., the Ashcroft
nomination. I hope every Democrat and
independent in the US gets a chance to read this - I will certainly pass it on
- and realize what’s going on with the Republicans/conservatives.
Thank
you for stating your views so well.
Carolyn
Hebert
Memphis,
Tennessee
------------------------------
Message-From: “Stephen S.
Bates” <sbates@neosoft.com>ID:
To: <hammerschlag@bigfoot.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001
01:24:54 -0600
Subject: RE: Relativity or are
Republicans evil? (Or do they just act that way?)
A
powerful essay, Mr. Hammerschlag! I’ve just spent two days writing dozens of emails
to most of the Democratic Senators and
the few courageous
Representatives in the CBC, urging, praising, chiding, imploring, regarding the
recent challenge to electors
and
the upcoming confirmation hearings, all the while doing the work I must to earn
a living. I’m weary as hell... and grateful
for
the inspiration your essay provides me to keep challenging the GOP SOB’s who
are wresting democracy from our grasp, and the
weak
Democrats (by no means all of them, of course) who may yet let it happen. Let
me reassure you... somebody out here gives a
damn
what happens next. Thank you! - Steve Bates
Stephen S. Bates mailto:stephen@stephenbates.com
PO Box 272488 http://www.stephenbates.com
Houston, TX 77277-2488
From: doggywogy@webtv.net
(doggywoggy)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001
23:05:21 -0500 (EST)
You
are a hopelessly twisted sick person. Only a demented, convoluted, i.e. liberal
mushhead could believe your crap. Do me a favor and DON’T
email me back.
From: Yvonne Provencher
<yvonnepr@acadian.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001
20:00:39 -0600
Dear
Sir:
FINALLY,
finally I have found, in your commentary, the words that express what I felt
about what happen in the election. I
was beginning to wonder if I was all
alone
in my opinions. Thank you so much,
Yvonne
Provencher
From: THUNDERWOLF666@webtv.net
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001
23:46:13 -0500 (EST)
Mr
Mike,
I
just wanted you to know that your on-line
journal article dated jan 10 brought tears of rage and hate to my eyes!
I, for one feel as though
we
have literally been raped by this clown! I’M READY TO FIGHT! We must mobilize
quickly or stand the risk of being eliminated in the
future!
And I dont mean the far-off future! I’m scared for my grandchildren more than
anything! These pigs are on a mission to carry
forward
everything that was started in Germany in 1933! Does no one remember King Georges daddys state-of-the-union
address in
the
early 9’s when he spoke of a “New World Order”? This was Hitlers exact
terminolgy during his cusping moment in 1941 as he was about to
roll
over Poland! I have the 1942 Brittanica Book of The Year to prove it!
I
pray that somehow God gets us out of this awful mess!
Sincerely,
Ronald Lambert
Liked your
article except for the part where you lambasted Gore for not letting the Blacks
speak
on 6 Jan. Yes, I am shocked at Americans sitting on their duff. Obviously
civic and social studies classes have failed to teach democracy. Without
democracy we do not have the rule of law, only the rule of tyrants. No
matter how much they pretend in Congress, in the media, or that part of the
general public that does not realize what has happened, there is only the
semblance of the rule of law. I just wonder when martial law will be
declared. Will it be during the demonstrations at the inaugural?
As to Ashcroft not suppose to be confirmed, I, too, wondered about that.
Cheney/Bush is simply testing the waters. Will the Democrats
lie down and
roll over? From my last reading there are still enough Democrats who are
left undecided and could confirm Ashcroft who in no way represents what the
Democratic party stands for. It is obvious the appointed president has no
intention to unite the country when he has proposed people for cabinet
positions that are far to the right. Cheney/Bush have no intention of
ruling from the center.
Karen Boerboom
2369 Airport Road
Platteville, WI 53818
------------------------------------------
This
is no longer the party of Lincoln, but of Jefferson Davis, John Wilkes Booth
and Joe McCarthy. I have long contended
that the Republican Party is
on
the cutting edge of an American brand of clerical fascism. The religious right has taken over the core
of the party. George Bush is doing his
damnedest
to talk us into a recession for two simple reasons: 1) to hang it on Bill
Clinton and 2) to get his tax cut of 1.3 trillion dollars, most of
which
will go to his rich friends and supporters.
Good
luck and keep exposing the hypocrites.
RE: WHOOPS, HOW THE MEDIA GOT IT WRONG
From: Steven Bushman <bushmanbreeden@sprintmail.com>
To: <editor@mediachannel.org>
Sent: Saturday, January
06, 2001 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: Michael
Hammerschlag, Freelance Writer:
·
I
have had the good fortune of having read some of the other work that has been
done by Mr. Hammerschlag. He brings
Editorial News Reporting
·
to
a new elevated level of excellence. I
think you should consider presenting more of his future material.
>
·
Respectfully,
Dr. Steven Bushman
·
612
Bridgewater Arch, VA Beach, VA 23462-7166
·
fax-2486,
pager: 521-6163
·
bushmanbreeden@sprintmail.com